|
Some Points for "Independent Administrative Corporation" System Toshiaki Matsuda July 1999 Comparison between the Independent Administrative Corporation in Japan and the Executive Agency in the United KingdomAs legislative system concerning public administration are different between Japan and the United Kingdom, it is not easy to make a simple comparison of government systems in both countries. Nevertheless, we can find some points in common between independent administrative corporations and the British executive agencies. Both are introduced to separate policy-making functions and policy- implementing functions, and to improve the efficiency and quality of services toward the people by granting more autonomy and responsibilities to a corporation and also to ensure the transparency of the operation. Both systems are similar in these respects since the executive agency system in the United Kingdom gave a hint in inventing this new system in Japan. There are also some differences between two systems. Independent administrative corporations are corporate bodies independent of the Government, while British executive agencies are a part of the national government. Moreover, employees of some independent administrative corporations have the status as public servants, while employees of every executive agency are public servants. Differences between the Systems of the Independent Administrative Corporation
The views expressed are those of the author and do not commit or necessarily reflect those of the Government of Japan. The author thanks Mr. Masahiro Horie, Director-General of the Statistical Standards Department for his very valuable advice and suggestions. Without his advice, this paper could not be produced. Criteria of Government Activities to be Transferred to the Independent Administrative Corporation System89 activities and organizations were selected, in the Cabinet Decision titled "Fundamental Plan for Streamlining and Efficiency of the Government" of April 27, 1999, to be transformed into independent administrative corporation system. They were decided through deliberations in earnest by the Administrative Reform Council, followed by impartial and fair consideration in the Government, based on the criteria stated in the Final Report of the Administrative Reform Council and the "Basic Law for the Reform of Ministries and Agencies". To put it concretely, government activities that meet the following three conditions are selected to be transferred to independent administrative corporations. 1. The activities that should be implemented without fail from public point of view, In connection with the above-mentioned condition 2, whether or not specific activities need be directly implemented in the name of the Government are judged mainly byexamining whether such activities are: 1. the exercise of public authority to directly and forcibly limit the rights of the people, Comparison between the Independent Administrative Corporation and the Public Corporation in JapanPublic corporation is defined, by the way how it is established, as a corporation established directly by law or a corporation established through the special procedure provided by a specific law. There are currently 81 public corporations as of April 1999. Each of them was established to meet specific policy needs of the time, and there is no basic law that prescribes the basic system common to all the public corporations. Naturally, therefore, there are considerable variety among public corporations in their activities, management, relationship with supervising ministries, and so on. Independent administrative corporations would have fallen into the aforementioned category of "the public corporation" since an independent administrative corporation is established through special procedure provided by a specific law. However, the independent administrative corporation is introduced as a new category of legal entity in that all the independent administrative corporations are subject to a common set of rules provided by "General Law for the Independent Administrative Corporation". Comparison between the two categories is difficult because there are few common characteristics among public corporations. However, it could be said that independent administrative corporations have three main features as compared to existing public corporations in general. 1. To promote flexibility and autonomy, the executives of independent administrative corporations are given more discretion in implementing the activity and management of the corporation. For example, while most public corporations are subject to annual approval of business plans by the supervising ministry, independent administrative corporations must ask for approval of business plans according to the medium-term targets for the term of three to five years set by the supervising ministry. 2. To promote transparency in accounting, independent administrative corporations must comply with corporate accounting standards and, unlike most public corporations, must have their accounts audited by certified public accountants. 3. To promote result-oriented improvement, the General Law provides that an evaluation committee to be set up in each supervising ministry should evaluate the activities of an independent administrative corporation annually and for the term of the medium-range targets, and the supervising ministry shall take appropriate measures based on the evaluation at the end of the term. In addition, the Evaluation Committee of the Ministry of General Affair, at the end of the medium-range term, gives advice to the supervising minister on necessary measures including changes and discontinuation of business of the corporation based on its evaluations. Government Activities Transferred to Independent Administrative Corporations(Tentative translation) Transferred in April 2001: Cabinet Office
Ministry of General Affairs
Ministry of the Treasury
Ministry of Education and Science
Ministry of Welfare and Labor
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries
Ministry of Economy and Industry
Ministry of National Land and Transport
Ministry of the Environment
Transferred in April 2002: Defense Agency
Transferred no later than in the first half of the year 2002: Ministry of National Land and Transport
Transferred in April 2003: Ministry of General Affairs
Transferred in the first half of the year 2003: Ministry of the Treasury
Transferred in the fiscal year 2004: Ministry of Welfare and Labor
Notes: Organizations with an asterisk (*) are currently research institute of the Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, Ministry of International Trade and Industry. Underscored are corporations with employees without the status of civil servants and the rest are corporations with employees with the status of civil servants. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2005 - The Asia Pacific Panel on Public Administration |